SRC Forum - Message Replies


Forum: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic Posted by: Reliability & Maintainability Forum (src_forum@alionscience.com )
Organization: System Reliability Center
Date Posted: Mon Aug 31 12:47:36 US/Eastern 1998

Back to message list Show all replies Topics List About this forum
Original Message:

Posted by: Ned H. Criscimagna (ncriscimagna@alionscience.com )
Organization:IITRI
Date posted: Fri Sep 25 15:26:46 US/Eastern 1998
Subject: Has DoD Deserted R&M?
Message:
Have Reliability and Maintainability Been Deserted by Dod? In the Second Quarter, 1998 issue of the RAC Journal (available on-line at URL ), my article on this subject appeared. The real question is what has motivated the DoD and military services to reduce their staffs dedicated to R&M? Even the Rome Laboratory (now the Air Force Laboratory Information Directorate) has relinquished its R&M role, a role not assumed by any other Air Force organization. What do you think prompted these actions? Do you see similar reductions in the numbers of R&M engineers employed in industry? If so, to what do you attribute these reductions? I really would like to hear your views.


Previous reply
Reply:

Subject: DoD Deserting R&M
Reply Posted by: A K Seah (aseah@eagle.org )American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
Date Posted: Mon Dec 14 18:10:00 US/Eastern 1998
Message:
While I do not have any inkling on DoD's motive, I do feel that it is not deserting R&M. I also think that DoD is looking to industry in general to support its R&M activities. We in the marine industry are only just beginning to introduce R&M albeit with almost insurmountable difficulties. Pockets of activities are going on, including collection of RAM data. Most without signigicant results. In my view, there is a lack of coordination on how and in what form reliability ought to be applied. Looking back on MIL-STD 785 for example, the regime defined therein is technically sound, but to apply it in commerical shipping industry would be a hard sell. The future for R&M is not at all gloomy; what it needs is to define a scheme - one less rigorous than MIL-STD but good enough to do the needful in system reliability prediction, maintenance management, life cycle cost optimization, etc. - which has commerical application. Most statutory regulations will migrate to a risk-based regime. And a very important element underlying this migration is application of reliability technology. We are looking at this and would like to know anyone that could help.


Reply to this message
Next reply