SRC Forum - Message Replies


Forum: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic Posted by: Reliability & Maintainability Forum (src_forum@alionscience.com )
Organization: System Reliability Center
Date Posted: Mon Aug 31 12:47:36 US/Eastern 1998

Back to message list Topics List About this forum
Original Message:

Posted by: Henry Davis (henry.davis@das.honeywell.com )
Organization:Honeywell DAS
Date posted: Fri Feb 26 17:11:33 US/Eastern 1999
Subject: MIL-HDBK-217
Message:
We are in process of updating reliability predictions from previous revisions of MIL-HDBK-217. Specifically from 217 Rev C, and 217 Rev F to 217 Rev F, CN2.The question is what would be the anticipated deltas in failure rate between the different models. If specific information is not available, then I would appreciate any general comments relating to this subject. We would like to use this as a sanity check for the results we are obtainig.


Reply:

Subject: Mil-Hdbk-217
Reply Posted by: Bruce Dudley (bdudley@alionscience.com )
Organization: Reliability Analysis Center
Date Posted: Wed Mar 3 9:52:29 US/Eastern 1999
Message:
We at the Reliability Analysis Center have not done a specific delta failure rate change analysis for the various revisions to Mil-Hdbk-217. In general, the part failure rates have decreased with improved quality control procedures. As a rough measure, I estimated that from version "C" to "F" the equipment level failure rate would be improved by a factor of 8 and from "F" to Notice #2, the improvement would be about 2. These estimates are based on a sample of the failure rates from each book and then averaged using the part population mix as shown in the Reliability Toolkit, Commercial Practices Edition.


Back to message list Topics List About this forum
Reply to this message