SRC Forum - Message Replies

Forum: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic: Reliability & Maintainability Questions and Answers

Topic Posted by: Reliability & Maintainability Forum ( )
Organization: System Reliability Center
Date Posted: Mon Aug 31 12:47:36 US/Eastern 1998

Back to message list Topics List About this forum
Original Message:

Posted by: Terry McCrossan
Date posted: Mon Jul 5 17:24:19 US/Eastern 1999
Subject: Component Derating
Does anyone have any new quantifiable data on the use of component parameter derating (thermal, power etc). I am used to the usual "margin of ignorance" type arguments, package glass transition temperatures and the junction/channel type Arrhenius relationships (generally with assumed activation energies). However, is there any more recent quantifiable data available to convince a sceptical design engineer and to what extent is derating used?


Subject: Derating information/Data.
Reply Posted by: Eugene L. Neuliep ( )
Organization: ORBITAL
Date Posted: Tue Jul 6 14:37:41 US/Eastern 1999
In our business we use ELV-JC-002(D)"PARTS, MATERIALS, AND PROCESSES CONTROL PROGRAM FOR EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES." We do not have the time to dig into every specific component and determine the potential "EXCEPTIONS" to these "Blind" rules. To do so would make each piece part a research project. We can not afford anything like that. These are not really arguments. They are basic rules that have and are being followed to design high reliability electronics where Human Life and Much finacial Gain or Loss could or would be at risk. Also try NASA 311-INST-001 (I have A) "INSTRUCTIONS FOR EEE PARTS SELECTION, SCREENING, AND QUALIFICATION. I hope that I have helped. Regards, GeneN. Regards, GeneN.


Subject: Derating
Reply Posted by: Seymour F. Morris ( )
Organization: Reliability Analysis Center
Date Posted: Mon Jul 12 9:45:44 US/Eastern 1999
Terry, Based on a search of current literature, I was unable to find any "new" data on component derating neatly summarized for a wide array of electronic components. Much of the current guidance is based on studies performed by the Air Force during the 1980's, such as RADC-TR-84-254 (ADA153744), Reliability Derating Procedures. These studies often found there way into later guidelines such as MIL-STD-975C(NASA)-Appendix A: Standard Parts Derating Guidelines, probably with some modification. However, for the most part, the basic guidelines have not changed much over the years for many components. The underlying basis for the guidelines is from sources such as Reliability Physics Symposium ( While technical papers in these symposiums often do not use the term "derating", their findings often can be used to estimate levels of risk associated with different levels of applied component stress. If you are interested in failure rate versus stress levels for a specific class of components, scouring proceedings of symposia such as IRPS can often be a valuable source of data that leads to answers. As you imply, the appropriate stress level to use is not a black and white issue. It really comes down to the critically of the system and the tolerance for failure one can accept. Seymour

Back to message list Topics List About this forum
Reply to this message